Gold Spot prices hit all time high on Monday, June 21, 2010, however Gold reversed intraday and by the of the day they were down 1.83% and closed at the low of the day at 1,232.60. Although sudden, these intraday reversals after making a multi-week, multi-month, multi-year or even all-time highs are quite common when the trend is changing. Another common element at a trend change is a fundamental story to fool investors into making the wrong decisions. In 2001 when the Bull Market in gold started, there was on fundamental reason to own Gold according to most people. People looked down upon it as a non-income producing investment, since it doesn't pay dividends. Among traders, there were only 5% bulls in gold in 2001. Now, with 95% of traders bullish, everybody loves Gold and will give a fundamental justification for why you should own it, just the same as they gave you a fundamental justification for why you shouldn't in 2001. Now, there are commercials for companies looking to "buy your gold", talking about how much the price of Gold has risen since 2001. Well my question is, why would you want to own it if it has already risen better than 5 fold since 2001? The extreme in optimism at gold's peak is normal, just like any other market. By the time Gold bottoms out, people will hate it again, remembering 2001 when there was "no reason" to own gold. I could easily be wrong about Gold, as it is a true store of value, but if the Dollar rises, which I think it will, that will hasten the decline in Gold. Although the fundamentals paint a picture for why you should own gold right now, the technicals are painting a more bearish picture, as illustrated in the attached charts, one being a daily chart and one being a weekly chart of Gold futures. Gold has completed (or is close to completing) a 5-wave Elliott Wave uptrend dating back to the beginning of its bull market in 2001. This move is impulsive and suggests that after an A-B-C correction, Gold will begin a new uptrend. However, in the mean time gold should have a fairly steep correction, perhaps retesting or breaking below its October 2008 low of 680.75. If this happens, I will view it as not only a buying opportunity for the short or intermediate term, but a long term investment opportunity. Gold is a true store of value and the only real money in the world.
Monday, June 21, 2010
A potential reversal in Gold
Gold Spot prices hit all time high on Monday, June 21, 2010, however Gold reversed intraday and by the of the day they were down 1.83% and closed at the low of the day at 1,232.60. Although sudden, these intraday reversals after making a multi-week, multi-month, multi-year or even all-time highs are quite common when the trend is changing. Another common element at a trend change is a fundamental story to fool investors into making the wrong decisions. In 2001 when the Bull Market in gold started, there was on fundamental reason to own Gold according to most people. People looked down upon it as a non-income producing investment, since it doesn't pay dividends. Among traders, there were only 5% bulls in gold in 2001. Now, with 95% of traders bullish, everybody loves Gold and will give a fundamental justification for why you should own it, just the same as they gave you a fundamental justification for why you shouldn't in 2001. Now, there are commercials for companies looking to "buy your gold", talking about how much the price of Gold has risen since 2001. Well my question is, why would you want to own it if it has already risen better than 5 fold since 2001? The extreme in optimism at gold's peak is normal, just like any other market. By the time Gold bottoms out, people will hate it again, remembering 2001 when there was "no reason" to own gold. I could easily be wrong about Gold, as it is a true store of value, but if the Dollar rises, which I think it will, that will hasten the decline in Gold. Although the fundamentals paint a picture for why you should own gold right now, the technicals are painting a more bearish picture, as illustrated in the attached charts, one being a daily chart and one being a weekly chart of Gold futures. Gold has completed (or is close to completing) a 5-wave Elliott Wave uptrend dating back to the beginning of its bull market in 2001. This move is impulsive and suggests that after an A-B-C correction, Gold will begin a new uptrend. However, in the mean time gold should have a fairly steep correction, perhaps retesting or breaking below its October 2008 low of 680.75. If this happens, I will view it as not only a buying opportunity for the short or intermediate term, but a long term investment opportunity. Gold is a true store of value and the only real money in the world.
Monday, June 14, 2010
The United States of America: So advanced, but have we come too far?
The technical work of Robert Prechter and Elliott Wave International, as well as other sources of technical analysis and social trends suggests this recession is not like any other we have seen before. In fact it suggests we have completed an Elliott Wave uptrend of at least 70 years, of a degree called Supercycle. In fact, we may even have completed an uptrend lasting 200 years, of Grand Supercycle degree, dating back to 1764, right before the declaration of independence and the founding of this great country in 1776. If one looks at all the advancements there have been in this country that opened the door to prosperity for so many, it is astounding. There have been terrific advancements in medicine, transportation, technology, astronomy, and human understanding of so many things. On January 27,2000, President Bill Clinton gave what could be the best report card for America in its history. Clinton began the state of the Union Address by saying "Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of congress, honored guests, my fellow Americans: We are fortunate to be alive in this moment in history. Never before has our nation enjoyed at once, so much prosperity and social progress, with so little internal crisis, so few external threats. Never before have we had such a blessed opportunity, and therefore, such a profound obligation, to build the more perfect union of our founders dreams. We began the century with over 20 million new jobs, the fastest economic growth in more than 30 years, the lowest unemployment rates in 30 years, the lowest poverty rates in 20 years, the lowest African American and Hispanic Unemployment rates on record, the first back to back surpluses in 42 years, and next month America will achieve, the longest period of economic growth in our entire history. The Founding Fathers would have been in tears if they could be there. But did social progress go to far?
In 2000, Everything seemed perfect, the stock market was soaring to new highs, everybody was wealthy, and sentiment was at extreme optimistic levels. I would bet that if Americans were given the economic and social picture 10 years down the road, they wouldn't believe it, the same way they won't believe the forecast that Elliott Wave gives for the 10 years after the bottom of this bear market. Instead of calling Elliott Wave International Perma-bears, they will call them Perma-bulls for being so optimistic in a time of economic depression. These extremes in optimistic sentiment at the end of an uptrend are a normal part of human social progress and suggest a correction will begin shortly. The bigger the uptrend that completes, the more extreme optimism there will be in every financial market, as well as people personalities and attitudes in general. The very extreme optimism that existed in 1999 and 2000 is to be expected considering the size of the uptrend we have completed. However, at the ultimate bottom, there will be extreme pessimism, with people possibly saying the end of the world is coming. This will be a signal that another VERY large advance in human social progress is about to begin, possibly a Grand Supercycle Bull Market lasting 200 years.
Elliott Wave analysis goes much further into depth than just stock prices. It is easy to confuse what these waves of optimism and pessimism really mean. What Elliott Wave Theory suggests is that social mood moves in waves of optimism and pessimism, and that is modeled by stock prices. If this is a Grand Supercycle Bear Market, should people be worried? No. The word I would use is people should use caution, making sure to keep their assets in safe places such as cash and gold. Deflation does not have to hurt anybody. There are safe places to keep one's wealth to be able to capitalize off of the bargains in stocks, commodities and real estate that will ultimately be there at the bottom.
In 2000, Everything seemed perfect, the stock market was soaring to new highs, everybody was wealthy, and sentiment was at extreme optimistic levels. I would bet that if Americans were given the economic and social picture 10 years down the road, they wouldn't believe it, the same way they won't believe the forecast that Elliott Wave gives for the 10 years after the bottom of this bear market. Instead of calling Elliott Wave International Perma-bears, they will call them Perma-bulls for being so optimistic in a time of economic depression. These extremes in optimistic sentiment at the end of an uptrend are a normal part of human social progress and suggest a correction will begin shortly. The bigger the uptrend that completes, the more extreme optimism there will be in every financial market, as well as people personalities and attitudes in general. The very extreme optimism that existed in 1999 and 2000 is to be expected considering the size of the uptrend we have completed. However, at the ultimate bottom, there will be extreme pessimism, with people possibly saying the end of the world is coming. This will be a signal that another VERY large advance in human social progress is about to begin, possibly a Grand Supercycle Bull Market lasting 200 years.
Elliott Wave analysis goes much further into depth than just stock prices. It is easy to confuse what these waves of optimism and pessimism really mean. What Elliott Wave Theory suggests is that social mood moves in waves of optimism and pessimism, and that is modeled by stock prices. If this is a Grand Supercycle Bear Market, should people be worried? No. The word I would use is people should use caution, making sure to keep their assets in safe places such as cash and gold. Deflation does not have to hurt anybody. There are safe places to keep one's wealth to be able to capitalize off of the bargains in stocks, commodities and real estate that will ultimately be there at the bottom.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Is Deflation back?


In reviewing the charts of the 10-year treasury yield, it looks as if yields could have had a fake-out move to the upside to fool everybody into thinking the bond bear market was starting. Looking at a weekly chart of the 10-year treasury yield, there is clear negative divergence present on the MACD. This is foreshadowing an upcoming environment of falling interest rates and Deflation. It looks as it though if will be some time before the fed "raises" key interest rates again. I say "raises" because the fed is often credited with lowering or raising interest rates. However, I am including in post a chart (by Elliott Wave International) of the 3-month short term treasury bill rate plotted with the Fed Funds rate that suggests otherwise. It is clear that the 3-month U.S. Treasury Bill Yield moves BEFORE the Fed Funds rate moves, and the Fed Funds rate always follows the market not leads it. The reason is, the Fed can only take the what the market will give them, just the same as investors can only buy stocks for what someone else will sell it to them for. Now one must ask the question, what makes interest rates move? The answer is the demand for, and the supply of, money and credit. As Robert Prechter, Elliott Wave International's President, said in a Bloomberg Television Interview in November 2007 "When People's borrowing needs dry up we'll, its like a sale in a store, the rates start going down, and that's the price of money, the interest rate." I did mention that I thought Interest Rates will be rising in this Bear Market, and I do, except not until later into it. Recent downtrend confirmations in global markets suggests that Deflation will hit ALL markets as Credit Contracts on a worldwide basis, very much the same as in 2008. I have said before that I do not believe the period of contracting credit is not over, but it is just starting. It looks at the moment as though the deflationary environment is returning to global markets. On a fundamental note, world markets are falling as Greece struggles with sovereign debt issues. Ultimately, it looks as though Europe is in big trouble, and by the time this is over, the Euro could be almost worthless. In the meantime, the U.S. Dollar should benefit, as it already has. But, the U.S. Dollar has been rising since November 26, 2009, BEFORE the Greece Debt problem news started surfacing. What could be the reason? I believe its because people assume the wrong premise. People think the reason the U.S. Dollar is rising is because the Euro is falling and because of the bad news out of Greece, Spain and Portugal, and not because of a strong Dollar or the technicals related to the Dollar. I beg to differ. I made a post on November 20, 2009 calling for a bottom in the Dollar. Not because of any fundamental reason, but because there was such an abundance of pessimism in the U.>S Dollar and inflation worries, that a change in psychology was due. That is exactly what happened, as it has had a nice rise since then, and I believe it has much further to go. The Dollar is strong not because it is fundamentally strong, because no fiat currency is, but it is strong due to the fact that the U.S. Dollar is the most inflated currency in the world. There is more debt denominated in U.S. Dollars than in any other currency. There is such a huge volume of dollar-denominated debt in the world that it is not possible for it to be paid off. As the debt contracts in value because it is either being paid off in part(debt settlement) or completely defaulted upon (default), the dollars are being eliminated from the global money supply. As the dollars are are being taken out of the global money supply, the remaining dollars are becoming more valuable. This is the fundamental argument by Prechter as to why to U.S. Dollar is rising in a Deflationary Environment. So, as the demand for money and credit goes down, the price, the interest rate, goes down with it. However, eventually when credit markets return to normal, and demand comes back, it will most likely exceed the supply of credit, and that is when the Bond Bear Market will start, and people will no longer trust the U.S. Government to keep its spending down, so interest rates (the return investors will demand due to a perceived increase in risk) will be rising. In the meantime, however, Deflation seems to be taking over in financial markets, so the trend for interest rates, and most likely commodities, stocks, and real estate, is down, similar to 2008. This might come as a surprise to most after many of these markets, specifically stocks and commodities, have gone up significantly in a reflationary period, convincing everybody the worst is over and a new Bull Market has started, but the reflation is most likely over. But that is what markets do: They fool the greatest number of people possible.
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
"What if 6 Dow stocks went to zero?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHdXU0Tbo9w
What if they didn't? What if instead Citigroup rallied 460%?
This was the title of a Bloomberg Television segment on March 6, 2009, the exact day of the 6,470 low in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The video shows how little impact 6 stocks, including, GM, Citigroup,and Bank of America, falling to zero would have on the dow, which is price-weighted. This means the lower the price of the stock, the less of an impact that stocks has on the Dow. These 6 Dow Stocks falling to zero would have taken just 47 points off the Dow. This video was talking about how these stocks falling to zero would indicate much larger problems in the economy and how it would suggest the rest of the stock market would fall along with it. Yet, the day of this gloomy outlook for 6 Dow stocks, the market bottomed and geared up for a 70%+ rally. Citigroup has rallied, low to high, over 460% since its bottom on March 6. Since its low on February 20, 2009, Bank of America has rallied an amazing 685%! Now that the market has rallied over 70% since the low, you don't exactly see this type of gloomy outlook from analysts and reporters on the financial media. Everybody is ready to buy stocks again at these over-inflated prices, but they hated them at the March 2009 low. This process is a natural human psychology cycle in financial markets. Financial market participants herd with the crowd, blow up a speculative bubble, only to see it pop. Yet, when investors get out at the bottom, saying "I give up!" They won't want to get back in until a top is close, and they will naturally try to rationalize it, saying "oh well, its lower than the last time I bought it anyway." This suggests that the traditional laws of supply and demand in an economy do not apply to financial markets. Rather, it suggests that markets "herd" in a series of Elliott Waves, as discovered by Ralph Nelson Elliott in the 1930's (for more on Elliott Wave Theory, see my first post). In the market for milk and other economic markets, consumers receive a certain amount of utility that they believe is more than the oppportunity cost they incur when they trade their currency for goods. They will wait until the price comes down if it is too high to buy it. But in the market for stocks, people don't want to wait for the price to come down, but rather they want to jump on board to ride the stock market higher. Soon everybody is buying into the market until it is up 400%, with no signs of heading down. But all of a sudden, the market reverses. Then it drops lower, and lower, and lower, until the same consumer who waited for the price of milk to come down before buying it didn't do that with his stock portfolio, and lost most of the money he invested in the stock market. at the bottom, he says, " I've had enough!" and sells it, only to watch it double in price off of its extreme price low. It is quite interesting how different financial markets are from economic markets, even though if they were treated the same way people would be much better off. This does not mean, however, that if an investment starts to go against an investor he should wait until the price bottoms and starts uptrending again. He should define his objectives and risk tolerances and set a stop loss, or have a money management plan in place BEFORE investing in the first place. This, I believe, is a key element to financial success.
What if they didn't? What if instead Citigroup rallied 460%?
This was the title of a Bloomberg Television segment on March 6, 2009, the exact day of the 6,470 low in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The video shows how little impact 6 stocks, including, GM, Citigroup,and Bank of America, falling to zero would have on the dow, which is price-weighted. This means the lower the price of the stock, the less of an impact that stocks has on the Dow. These 6 Dow Stocks falling to zero would have taken just 47 points off the Dow. This video was talking about how these stocks falling to zero would indicate much larger problems in the economy and how it would suggest the rest of the stock market would fall along with it. Yet, the day of this gloomy outlook for 6 Dow stocks, the market bottomed and geared up for a 70%+ rally. Citigroup has rallied, low to high, over 460% since its bottom on March 6. Since its low on February 20, 2009, Bank of America has rallied an amazing 685%! Now that the market has rallied over 70% since the low, you don't exactly see this type of gloomy outlook from analysts and reporters on the financial media. Everybody is ready to buy stocks again at these over-inflated prices, but they hated them at the March 2009 low. This process is a natural human psychology cycle in financial markets. Financial market participants herd with the crowd, blow up a speculative bubble, only to see it pop. Yet, when investors get out at the bottom, saying "I give up!" They won't want to get back in until a top is close, and they will naturally try to rationalize it, saying "oh well, its lower than the last time I bought it anyway." This suggests that the traditional laws of supply and demand in an economy do not apply to financial markets. Rather, it suggests that markets "herd" in a series of Elliott Waves, as discovered by Ralph Nelson Elliott in the 1930's (for more on Elliott Wave Theory, see my first post). In the market for milk and other economic markets, consumers receive a certain amount of utility that they believe is more than the oppportunity cost they incur when they trade their currency for goods. They will wait until the price comes down if it is too high to buy it. But in the market for stocks, people don't want to wait for the price to come down, but rather they want to jump on board to ride the stock market higher. Soon everybody is buying into the market until it is up 400%, with no signs of heading down. But all of a sudden, the market reverses. Then it drops lower, and lower, and lower, until the same consumer who waited for the price of milk to come down before buying it didn't do that with his stock portfolio, and lost most of the money he invested in the stock market. at the bottom, he says, " I've had enough!" and sells it, only to watch it double in price off of its extreme price low. It is quite interesting how different financial markets are from economic markets, even though if they were treated the same way people would be much better off. This does not mean, however, that if an investment starts to go against an investor he should wait until the price bottoms and starts uptrending again. He should define his objectives and risk tolerances and set a stop loss, or have a money management plan in place BEFORE investing in the first place. This, I believe, is a key element to financial success.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Is Crude Oil ready to Roll over?


After Crude Oil's 78% decline in 2008, it has made quite a comeback, but is it ready to roll over? I have Daily and Weekly Charts posted. The wave structure is certainly open to interpretation, so comments welcome. Although this is technically not labeled as an ending diagonal since some of the waves sport a 5 wave pattern rather than a 3-3-3-3-3 (ending diagonals are supposed to be 5-wave structures, with each wave subdividing in a 3 wave (A up, B down, C up)manner) the move is very choppy and overlapping, telling us this is not an impulsive rise from Crude's $33/bbl low in December 2008. Another new low below $33 is quite possible. We'll let the market be the judge.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Dow 11,000, New Bull Market! Not so fast

Yesterday (Monday, April 12, 2010), the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed above 11,000 for the first time since September 2008. Most of the financial media is calling this a new Bull Market, and even the people who were bearish on the market the whole way up are being capitulated out of their short positions and into the "New Bull Market" camp. Now that investor sentiment has once again hit a territory of extreme optimism, everyone thinks this is a new bull market and good times are back. Earnings are improving, the economy is expanding, and we even had positive jobs growth reported a couple weeks ago for the first time since the recession began. People are optimistic that the economy is on its way back to sustainable growth. People seem to like stocks again over Dow 11,000. Isn't it funny, though, that on March 6, 2009, when the Stock market bottomed, none of that was true? All the news was bad news, the focus was on declining earnings, more job losses, and a contracting economy, not to mention credit markets that were virtually frozen. People thought the economy was going into the abyss, the Dow was headed to 5,000, and it was the end of the world. However, amidst all that pessimism, Ironically that was the time to be buying. The stock market has had a 70%+ rally since, then, and at these extreme prices once again, all of a sudden people like stocks again. Now that the news it good, people are just as sure that although it might be sluggish, the economy is on its way back to growth, and the Dow is on its way back to all-time highs than they were about a continued economic contraction back in March 2009. They are just as sure about the market continuing to go up as they were about the Dollar continuing to go down in late November 2009 with Inflation worries. Yet, the Dollar has rallied over 10% off its low, beginning only 6 days after my post on November 20, 2009 about the extreme pessimism present in the Dollar and the extreme optimism present in the metals markets. Even with optimism returning to Wall Street, the reality is, in my opinion, there are still many more problems with debt and credit markets that have not been solved, and we are still in a long term secular bear market. In 2003, the market bottomed and went to all-time highs, but just to fool everybody into thinking it was a new long-term sustainable bull market. What followed was the biggest decline since 1929-32, which produced the most oversold condition since that bear market. That gave this market the fuel to rally this high, but there are signs of waning upside momentum, just like we saw in 2007, and the wave structure is similar as well. Often times extreme optimism is accompanied by negative divergences in oscillators, such as the MACD, an indicator of momentum. A negative divergence in the MACD indicates waning upside momentum, when price makes a higher high, but the MACD does not. For more info on this, read my prior posts. Attached to this post I am showing a weekly chart of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, where negative divergence is clearly present. Sentiment readings are extremely high, and stock valuations are horrible. The next time pessimism is as it was in March 2009, and valuations are reasonable I'll be buying. A lot of people who cannot control their emotions (the vast majority of people, especially the mom and pop businesses and individual investors, who typically get in at market tops and out at bottoms), may not have the money to invest when the bargains finally do show up, but the people that are patient and keep their wealth safe will not have to worry about losing money and will most likely get rewarded with bargains on cheap stocks and receive good dividends on undervalued companies (high dividend payments relative to the price of stocks are an element of cheap valuations). The worst that can happen to someone who stays conservative, if I am wrong about the market, is missed higher returns. But someone who takes unnecessary risks can lose all or most of their money. In the mean time, don't be fooled by the market, because that is what the market does all the time. Keep your wealth safe, in safe cash equivalents(short term only t-bills) and at savings accounts at safe banks, and when the final bottom comes, you will have to money to invest for better times ahead.
Thursday, March 25, 2010
The end of an Era


It is my belief that we have reached the end of an era. Exactly when that ended (2000 or 2007) and to what degree is up for debate. However, what is evident is that we have reached the end of the era of low interest rates and easy credit that began in 1981. Likewise, if this turns out to be true, and interest rates have made a major bottom, that means U.S. Treasury bond prices have made a major top (since interest rates and bond prices are inversely correlated). The case for the end of the Bond bull market and the start of a major Bull market in interest rates can be made, I believe, from both a fundamental and technical perspective. From the fundamental perspective, the amount of outstanding U.S. Government debt issued is so large that it CANNOT be paid back and this type of fiscal situation is not sustainable in the long run, and I believe that eventually, the piper will be paid.In my view there is simply no way we can afford to pay back the debt when our GDP is 70% consumption. According to an official government website, treasurydirect.gov, the total public outstanding debt as of March 24, 2010 is $12,662,466,657,519.82. Bond Investors will demand a higher interest rate for the simple economic principle that risk requires compensation. If government debt is going to be considered high risk, you can bet high interest rates will come with it. In my opinion, it is only a matter of time before the Credit Worthiness of the U.S. government is put into question not just by foreigners (namely Japan and China) which fund a good portion of out debt, but by its own citizens. That is the fundamental part of the argument. From a technical perspective, above are two charts, both of the 10-year U.S. Treasury Bond yield. In Technical Analysis, we say that when downtrend lines are broken, they are retested, meaning the price of the security temporarily goes against the(new) trend to find support on the downtrend line in the case of a turn from a downtrend to an uptrend, and retest to find resistance at the uptrend line in the case of a turn from an uptrend to a downtrend. Granted, a break of the uptrend or downtrend lines are not guarantees that the trend has changed, but rather an indication of a possible trend change, hence the question mark next to the "retest after breakout" annotation on Chart 2. If the downtrend in interest rates is continuing, then the downtrend line will not act as support and the 10-year yield will break back below the downtrend line. However, if I am correct in my analysis and interest rates bottomed in 2008, the spike low in the Fall of 2008 was just a final thrust down in interest rates (and thrust up in bond prices) before making a major trend reversal. Chart 1 is the same as Chart 2 except that it is shown on Logarithmic Scale, while Chart 1 is shown in Arithmetic scale. Chart 1 illustrates the long term downtrend line on the 10-year Treasury yield. When that is broken, it will certainly be something to pay close attention to, because it will likely signal the start of a multi-decade move up in interest rates. In addition, on chart two I show a common indicator called the MACD, which stands for Moving Average Convergence Divergence. Without going into too much detail, this is an indicator of momentum. When price makes a lower low or higher high and the indicator does not confirm with a higher high or a lower low (depending on the trend), it is called a divergence. In this case price (Interest Rates) have made a lower low, but the MACD has made a higher low, creating positive divergence. This is another sign that the momentum in the long-term downtrend in interest rates is slowing dramatically and a turn higher is coming, possibly (likely in my opinion) as early as this year (2010). I will post an update if and when this happens. As a side note, rising interest rates are generally not positive for equity prices, and with the way things look now, if interest rates spike higher, it could be accompanied by a precipitous drop in equity prices and quite possibly a resumption of the bear market in U.S. equities. I will also post an update on the stock market soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
